Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of malignant lymphocytes in the lymph nodes, spleen, blood, and bone marrow. Although current clinical treatment approaches targeting Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) and Bcl-2, either as monotherapy or in combination are highly effective with high overall response, complete responses, and achievement of undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD), most patients eventually experience disease relapse. In this study, we utilized our unique mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) system, which mimics the in vivo stromal environment in CLL, to explore the combination interaction effect of the first-in-class BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib, with novel tumor microenvironment (TME)-directed drugs in CLL.
Methods: Since 1999, patients with CLL seen at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN have been offered participation in a longitudinal study of CLL B-cell Biology (CLL Tissue Bank). This Tissue Bank is seamlessly integrated into the Mayo Clinic CLL Database where the clinical characteristics of all patients are prospectively maintained. Using this resource, we identified previously untreated CLL patients (n=10) for our experiments. Individuals with high risk CLL (defined as those with both unmutated IGHV gene mutations and either del17p- or del11q- by FISH) (n=5) and with low risk CLL (defined as those with both mutated IGHV genes and no del17p- or del11q- by FISH) (n=5) were studied. Annexin-V/PI apoptotic cell death assays were employed to evaluate the effects of TME-directed drugs including everolimus (mTOR inhibitor), MI-2 (MALT1 inhibitor), ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor), S63845 (MCL-1 inhibitor), and venetoclax (Bcl-2 inhibitor) either as single agent, or in combination with ibrutinib on CLL B cells in direct contact with MSCs. Dose response curves and IC50 levels were generated for single agent killing effect in CLL. The combination interaction effects were determined by Combination Index (CI) values generated by CalcuSyn software indicating synergistic (CI < 0.9), additive (CI between 0.9 - 1.1), or antagonistic (CI > 1.1) interactions. Among drug combinations with synergistic CI values, the following indicated different levels: below 0.1 very strong, 0.1 - 0.3 strong, 0.3 - 0.7 good, and 0.7 - 0.9 moderate synergism.
Results: All tested drugs exhibited different IC50 levels in CLL cells co-cultured with MSCs: MI-2 IC50 of 3.5uM, ruxolitinib IC50 of 18.5uM, S63845 IC50 of 0.115uM, venetoclax IC50 of 0.006uM, and both everolimus and ibrutinib did not reach IC50 levels at maximum tested doses. Of interest we observed more killing in high versus low-risk cohort when treated with everolimus (19uM vs. undetectable), MI-2 (2.5 vs. 4uM) and S63845 (0.09 vs. 0.14uM) as single agents (IC50, high vs. low, respectively), while ruxolitinib and venetoclax showed no differences. Combination interaction effect results showed highly synergistic interactions for all patients (good to strong synergism) when ibrutinib was combined with S63845 or venetoclax, moderate to strong synergism for ibrutinib and everolimus, moderate synergism to additive levels for ibrutinib and MI-2, and moderate synergism to antagonism for ibrutinib and ruxolitinib. We also observed more synergism in the low-risk cohort when treated with ibrutinib and MI-2/ruxolitinib combinations, but no difference with ibrutinib and everolimus/S63845/venetoclax combinations between low and high-risk cohort.
Conclusions: In summary, we evaluated the pre-clinical combination effects of ibrutinib when used together with other novel agents on CLL B cells in the presence of TME, where patients were assigned to low or high-risk cohorts. Our study showed that ibrutinib exhibits highly synergistic effects with venetoclax, S63845 and everolimus in both cohorts. The observed difference in effectiveness between high and low-risk cohorts when treated with ibrutinib plus MI-2 or ruxolitinib suggests these combinations would be beneficial for a subset of patients with high risk CLL. These preclinical data offer preliminary insights that support the evaluation of therapeutic combinations in patient with high-risk CLL: a population with significant unmet medical needs.
Funding Statement: This study was funded and supported by Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company.
Han:Recursion Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Parikh:Novalgen Limited: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; MingSight: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kay:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS -Celgene: Other: data safety monitoring committee; Dren Bio: Other: data safety monitoring committee; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: data safety monitoring committee and advisory board; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Other: data safety monitoring committee; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: data safety monitoring committee and advisory board; Sunesis: Research Funding; Vincerx: Research Funding.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal